Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Forsberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 06:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Forsberg

Marrying someone notable, working as a model, and having had a bit part in a barely notable film does not equate to notability. I can find various music press references to her, but entirely as a secondary figure (i.e., the wife of a Stone Temple Pilots bandmember). Haven't found anything that establishes individual notability. Forsberg is no Yoko Ono or Courtney Love. Article is entirely unsourced, and also includes material (an allegation of bipolar disorder) that should probably be removed per WP:BLP if this is kept. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 22:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of reliable sources to indicate notability Lets drinkTea 23:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of independent notability and lack of sources. Adam Zel (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. No independent notability. Only Google News sources are articles about Weiland. THF (talk) 23:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to suggest notability independent of her husband 7triton7 (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.