Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markham Vineyards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Markham Vineyards

Not notable BodegasAmbite (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - This winery has the non-trivial reliable sources out there to establish notability, though this article does an incredibly poor job of establishing that. As it is, this article is providing really no pertinent information or benefit to the reader and just functioning as a WP:WINEGUIDE entry so it certainly wouldn't be a loss if it was deleted. But a decent article that passes WP:CORP could be created if anyone has the time to do it Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 16:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. I don't really feel strongly whether this article should be kept or deleted, although I'm not seeing (based on a casual search) that the products of this winery have achieved any notability. For article inclusion, the saving grace may be the size of the winery; it produces a significant quantity of wine (over 50,000 cases per year based on their growing area, as far as I can tell). ~Amatulić (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quantity of production is not how notability is determined for a company. See WP:CORP. Drawn Some (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's not quite true, if production is the primary feature. Bronco Wine Company is notable primarily for being a large producer of non-notable wines, for example. Markham Vineyards doesn't even come close to that level of production, however. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per AgnesDr. Blofeld (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.