Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Slammer
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Slammer
- Mark Slammer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod. Non-notable "singer/songwriter", No Ref's, No GNews or Gbooks hits, what first page of Ghits are to own sites or the WP page. Fails WP:GNG Mtking (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A musician who has only released a few singles, none of which were hits, isn't going to merit an article unless notability can be demonstrated via significant coverage in reliable sources. I found none.--Michig (talk) 08:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG, no signs of additional coverage out there. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with the above editors that this person fails WP:MUSICBIO. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.