Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjan Faraidooni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marjan Faraidooni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage. Creator removed deletion tags twice. DMySon (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment meets GNG, Entrepreneur, IIoT World. Emirates Woman, Arabian Business. are reliable sources. --Skwovet (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meets GNG how? Celestina007 (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unlike "thousands of other businesspeople." she is running a global conference with a printing press of sources. do not declare war on people that buy ink by the barrel. --Skwovet (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Basically echoing DMySon. Celestina007 (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

basic wp:basic: "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability" --Skwovet (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 22:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a couple of interviews do not establish notability nor do PR profiles. Whpq (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think being "Chief Experience Officer" at a business conference establishes notability. Thousands of people run and work at national conferences, that doesn't make them notable by Wikipedia's standards. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.