Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariscal Estigarribia
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn—Thanks Beyond My Ken for removing the fringe content. (non-admin closure) Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mariscal Estigarribia
- Mariscal Estigarribia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This reads like a complete hoax and a conspiracy theory. The references do not back up the claims made (or go to unreliable sources), and the whole thing has a lot of synthesis. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:07, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have restored the article to the state it was in in January, before the contributions of the IP editor who is the source of the OR, SYNTHESIS, non-RS, FRINGE and possible HOAX material. I concur with the editor who wrote in an edit summary that "whoever wrote this has some serious issues with reality. I hate to simply delete someone's writing, but this is ridiculous. That is an accurate assessment.
In the condition condition I've restored it to, it may need some trimming, copyediting or focusing, but I believe the nom's (quite justified) complaints are basically taken care of. Of course, if someone restores it to its previous state, then my !vote is to STUB it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It might need some trimming and most of the extraneous content about US military bases can be done away with, but it does appear to be a sizable town. [1] The Spanish Wikipedia article is a good place to get content from. --Oakshade (talk) 03:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I was able to locate this town using google map, so it appears that the town exists, and therefore this article should be kept pursuant to WP:NPLACE. Dolovis (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.