Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Bichón

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Bichón

Mario Bichón (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, lack significant coverage (please note that sources used are mostly newspapers from a town of 13,000 inhabitants). Further, the text of the article does not suggest there is reason to believe Mario Bichón is notable (it describes an ordinary live of a state employee). Sietecolores (talk) 05:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also fails WP:POLITICIAN. This bio is a collection of secondary facts: director of a local club, owner of a hotel, and councillor of a small town. --Warko ^talk 17:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. NN local councillor. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep They are more notable for being the chief of the local railway station and president of the sports club of his city, rather than for being just a city councilor. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 16:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neither of which are reasons for notability. A stationmaster and a local sports club president? Please! Just a local figure of no wider importance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Can't find anything to show they meet WP:GNG, and clearly doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NPOL, and without coverage outside his hometown fails also GNG Kraxler (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.