Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Oswald Porter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (declared as a mistake at WP:TH See here Nick Moyes (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Oswald Porter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not Notable she is only the wife of Lee Harvey Oswald who assassinated John F Kennedy. UserABCXYZ (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. UserABCXYZ (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Porter easily passes GNG: substantial coverage in the press,in Warren Commission and other investigations, extensive treatment in books on the assassination, and a book of her relationship with Oswald. As the Russian wife of a defector who killed a president, she is much more than the insignificant figure claimed in this nomination. Acroterion (talk) 18:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Key figure in one of the most significant events in US History. SkippyKR (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - per Acroterion, self-evidently notable, and frankly, after a look into the less than two week old edit history of the nominator, and their Talk page, I believe we have a problem editor. Update: I thank Acroterion for leaving a cautionary note on the nominator's Talk page. Jusdafax (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: An extremely bad nomination. I highly recommend the nominator not come back to AfD until they have a clear grasp of notability guidelines. Curbon7 (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Who would even raise the possibility of deleting this article and for what reason? That the person is not notable? She may have many defects, but the least important is not being notable. Definitely keep, for all of the reasons already given above. Thank you, warshy ^(¥¥) 20:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.