Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marin Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marin Family

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had previously speedy deleted this A7 but it was fairly quickly created again. No indication of notability for this family and no sources. For aristocratic titles our usual approach is to have an article on the title where the individual title holders can be mentioned. The individuals themselves only get an article if they have done something notable besides choosing the right parents per WP:INHERIT. Even less reason to have an article on the family of that individual. Also nominating Umberto Marin. Spinning Spark 19:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Notable relatives do not confer notability. ^King Jakob _C2 20:01, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A not notable Italian family.A family with some noble ancerstors.Italy now is a repubblic and following the Italian Costitution the title like Count can be used only as a part of the name and only if the title was awarded before 1922 is that hte case?In Italy now no person is titled lady or not due to his or her family background.User:Lucifero4

Delete Notability is not a genetic trait, so with no sources and no reason to believe that anyone named is notable of their own accord, there's no reason to keep it. HillbillyGoat (talk) 04:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is completely unsourced and does not establish that this family is notable enough to warrant an article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.