Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The obvious thing to do at this point is to withdraw the nomination. I may do some editing. DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article for minor academic. Many adjectives of praise, but the major actual accomplishment is getting a grant. Formerly, but not presently, an associate professor at Columbia. "Research associate professor" is n�ot normally a tenure-�track title. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The criteria for having the article deleted, as per WP:FAILN, have not been satisfied. According to WP:NACADEMICS, since the subject of the article meets the criterion of 1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources, the page warrants inclusion on Wikipedia. And, as opposed to simply deleting the article, the expert-subject tag (simple include {{}}) can be added to the article in order to improve its quality. Silver Buizel (talk) 06:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This recent article in The New Republic verifies that she was an innovator in developing the sociological concept of Historical trauma, a useful tool in understanding the problems faced by Native Americans such as the Sioux, as well as African Americans, Cambodians and the descendants of Holocaust survivors. Accordingly, she meets WP:ACADEMIC criterion 1. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:BIO. It seems WP:GNG is met, and it appears WP:AUTHOR is met as well. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I am WP:INVOLVED so I should not say anything other that what I have already done: it was me (a) who declined the speedy (b) added the The New Republic reference (c) added the {{Template:Third-party}} tag. (And yes, I know it should be "it was I" instead of "it was me", but it's perfectly understandable, and therefore grammatically correct in my somewhat oddball view of what "grammatically correct" means.) Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 08:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioral science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.