Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Mann Citation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Margaret Mann (librarian). Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Mann Citation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG lack of significant coverage WP:SIGCOV and no secondary sources Hughesdarren (talk) 03:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Margaret Mann (librarian) which already has this information.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 06:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have linked the Margaret Mann Citation page to the Margaret Mann Main Page. I would like to expand on this topic if it is not deleted. I hope this is more acceptable. Thanks for having patience with a newbie! ~~~~ note: this edit added by JCrim616. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this appears to be a big deal for people in this field (recognised as the highest honor in this area of librarianship(?)), i know that WP:NOTINHERITED (and this shouldnt be used for afds:) but reflecting this, recipients include: Henriette Avram (1971), Fred Kilgour (1974), Eva Verona (1976), and Hope A. Olson (2017). Coolabahapple (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, oops, should of said "one of the highest honors":). Coolabahapple (talk) 04:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It might be, but the current article says the same as the Margaret Mann (librarian) page at the mo. If JCrim616 does have further material and refs to back it up to show wp:n, then maybe should be moved to drafty until its ready? Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.