Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Davis (American football)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Marcus Davis (American football)
- Marcus Davis (American football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is a freshman college football player who has not yet established notability. While college football players can satisfy general notability guidelines, a good faith search does not reveal significant non-trivial coverage in the mainstream media (i.e., coverage beyond passing reference in game coverage). Cbl62 (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — Cbl62 (talk) 08:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATH (hasn't played in the highest level of the sport) and WP:GNG (hasn't receivied significant third-party coverage).--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 13:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He's only caught one pass in his college career. To include him would almost be like saying that any BCS football player's article should be kept. The inclusion of college athletes should not be so broad. --JamesAM (talk) 16:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment-For the record in future AFD's it's nice to notify the author of the discussion, also in the edit summary in the article, you should switchout Nominationname with name of the article, I have no opinion one way or the other on the article.--SKATER Speak. 19:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that Skater. This is my first AfD nomination, and we had spoken on your talk page about the article. So I thought you were aware of the intention, but I should have provided a further note about the AfD when it posted last night. Cbl62 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries, you might wanna try WP:Twinkle takes care of the pain in the ass that is deleting in a couple of seconds.--SKATER Speak. 03:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that Skater. This is my first AfD nomination, and we had spoken on your talk page about the article. So I thought you were aware of the intention, but I should have provided a further note about the AfD when it posted last night. Cbl62 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.