Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Stupenengo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Marcos Stupenengo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CV-style (auto)biography about a non-notable individual. Pure (self)promotion with no encyclopaedic value. A similar article has been repeatedly deleted on the Spanish language WP as an autobiography with no encyclopaedic value, and equally repeatedly recreated until salted, so I suggest that the article name should be salted here too. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 17:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional info. An article about Marcos Stupenengo was created earlier this year using the normal process but the submission was declined at AfC on 26 March 2013 because of a lack of reliable sources supporting the subject's notability. The present article was then created directly in article space in early June, most likely as a deliberate attempt to evade the AfC process and the scrutiny of the article that is part of it. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 14:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with the above. I researched IP addresses and usernames used here and in the Spanish version. It was easy to track them to Stupenengo. Example: the user Coconuto also exists in in Youtube for uploading Stupenengo own videos. The users were used to edit only things connected with him. Besides all this, he's not well known here in Argentina, and I doubt he's well known elsewhere, I don't thin anyone should spend time rewriting this CV into a real article. niqueco ✍ 02:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and niqueco. GregJackP Boomer! 13:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; seems to be promotional, and short on notability. bobrayner (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.