Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 2015 North India Unseasonal Rain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userify. Article already moved to draft space by User:सुमित सिंह on 19th May. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015 North India Unseasonal Rain

March 2015 North India Unseasonal Rain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not remotely ready to be published. The writing is so bad as to be unintelligible, and the title needs to be fixed to something that is not nonsensical, as well as notability established (just because there is more rain then usual does not mean there is anything special about it! It's weather!). This article, if it fits as a valid inclusion in Wikipedia, should be moved to the user's page and sent for the improvements on drafts, and definitely not be published until the English is fixed and intelligible if it does fit.                      ~Rayvn  19:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply This article published information about the current disaster caused by the weather in North India. On neutral point of view this article may seem just a usual incident but it affected on vast scale to locals. In March there was not only extra rain then usual but the very heavy rainfall on vast scale that damaged crop in the half area of the country.

Damages are : The 20% seasonal crop of the half area of country (Damage worth of approx Rs 10 thousand crore)
Fatalities around over 100 till now.
caused flood in Jammu & Kashmir.
- Also the name of the article is given as it is the name given to this incident by local and affected peoples, media, and also in official documents. Please see January_2015_North_American_blizzard.Grammatically errors may need to be fixed and welcomes to make this article more effective. सुमित सिंह (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete/userfy I think that comparing this to the article January_2015_North_American_blizzard shows what this article does not have -- no historical data, no scientific data, very little information on why this isn't just another bad weather year. None of the references I could access refer to the suicides (unfortunately I am unable to view the video as it just hangs; ditto the PDF.) If the creator of this wishes to continue to work on it, it can be done in user space, and then go through the articles for creation process. LaMona (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Abnormal weather patterns are going to be the norm due to global warming. Come back when it rains for 40 days and 40 nights. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• My Point It surprising that rather than trying to improve article, most reply indicating straight away deletion of this article. Also the comments came from those user who do not have any information and details about this incident and circumstances. The presentation of views and words used is also very disappointing and against the reputation of Wikipedia users. This event caused a major loss that almost equal to the GDP of some countries. on wikipedia there are thousand of articles that do not have proper information or need to be published. (I am not interested to provide their list). Still for some users it is difficult to judge which article required Wikipedia status or not. I am not the against of this discussion but it should on neutral basis. Please help to improve this article or nothing to do with it.

Mr. Rayan please sign your comment properly so we can reach to you easily.सुमित सिंह (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.