Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Gonllegos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

María Gonllegos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Participant in a pageant that was deemed not notable (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss United Continent (2nd nomination)) The Banner talk 12:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not only considering the pageant is not currently notable, nothing else imagines any better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - Let's first see if there are more sources pointing to notability. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Well, one should be checking to see if there are more sources before voting, but that's just me. Her stage name of "Lupita Gonzalez" (which is cited in the article) has an eyepopping total of 868 Google News hits, many of which involve her being an accomplished athlete as well, a number of which helpfully include the full "Maria Guadalupe González" name for doublechecking. Honestly, Google Translate is your friend ... Ravenswing 04:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - while news does return over 800 hits for Lupita Gonzalez, none of those appear to be about this particular aka of María Gonllegos. The Pan American runner does not appear to be the same person, and there is nothing in any of the articles to connect the two. Most of the 800 hits are for other people with this same name. The commonality of her aka makes researching under that difficult, but there does not appear to be, and none have been proffered, the type of in-depth coverage needed to meet WP:GNG, and under her real name there is virtually zero coverage. Btw, there is nothing to indicate, other than its mention in the article, which is uncited, that Gonllegos does go by an aka. Even the one source about her as an entertainer uses Gonllegos, not Gonzales. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.