Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mankind vs. The Undertaker (Boiler Room Brawl)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mankind vs. The Undertaker (Boiler Room Brawl)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Sources mention details about the match, but not why the match independently notable. Most of the article is taken up by a plot summary, while the "Legacy" section just mentions future storyline developments. Wikipedia is not a summary-only description of works. Also fails WP:PWMATCH/WP:LASTING. — Czello ^(music) 07:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — Czello ^(music) 07:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't need a standalone article separate to the event at which it took place. If any Taker-Foley match merits a standalone article, it's their Hell in a Cell match, which has a massive legacy, not this one..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable pro wrestling match suitable for Fandom wikis. --Mann Mann (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty clearly not notable.LM2000 (talk) 10:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am the creator of this article. I found an [1] that supports this match's importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulysses Grant Official (talk • contribs) 00:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources the source in question is unreliable so it can’t be used to demonstrate notability, or in other words is useless to support the match being important.--67.70.144.202 (talk) 02:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, The Sportster should never be used for any reason. It also takes multiple sources to demonstrate notability (WP:GNG).LM2000 (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sportskeeda is an unreliable source too, and the article relies on stuff by TheSportster and Sportskeeda (5/6 citations). The reliability of the remaining source (Kee On Sports Media Group) for pro wrestling content is uncertain. The match itself is not something special/notable outside of wrestling community. A notable PW match is something like Montreal Screwjob or Mankind vs. The Undertaker. --Mann Mann (talk) 05:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per others. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 15:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.