Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhunt (video game series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 11:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manhunt (video game series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a series by WP:VG's consensus: Manhunt consists of two games, without any substantial information about a possible sequel. No other media (books, films, etc.) or merchandise. It just repeats the information from Manhunt (video game) and Manhunt 2. Not worth redirecting, because by all accounts, there shouldn't be any mention of a "series". soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom; redundant with the articles about the individual games. The Recognition section does not have almost any sources talking about the games as a group. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a "series" of two, all this information can (and largely is) be covered in either the first or second game article. The reasoning is comparable to some of the bullet points at WP:MERGEREASON. Sergecross73 msg me 11:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, two games isn't a series. Plus the sources look primary or dodgy, not much third-party commentary. Plus the focus is overly skewed towards controversy. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — Czello 20:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ProtoDrake and nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Two of a kind don't make a series. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.