Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu churches
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 14:53, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Manchu churches
- Tagged, untagged, retagged... and ultimately got lost in a fD-limbo. no vote. Nabla 01:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. The author has created several articles on churches with no established notability and most containing no substantive information other than geographic location and the fact that the church is growing. Bubamara 10:33, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Bubamara. I could find only one relevant hit and it was just a list. -- Kjkolb 02:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Bubamara. Dlyons493 03:16, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Bubamara. Shauri 03:52, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Manchu. Kappa 15:11, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Paul 23:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This ancient afd nomination was again orphaned improperly, this time by Alhutch (talk · contribs) [1]. Relisting now. Will be irate if it needs to be done again. —Cryptic (talk) 03:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawang churches. Uncle G 14:34, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete under category A1. I really want to find a way to keep this article, but as it currently reads, it's barely more than a dictionary definition, with maybe half a sentence of information worth merging elswhere. Nothing links to it. A sure SD if any existed. -- llywrch 18:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dottore So 06:21, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the precedent given by Uncle G. Also, I'm not sure about process when the same V/AfD (and this same discussion has survived long enough actively to be both) spans July-October. Xoloz 09:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Cleanup and expand. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:18, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. What churches? When? Which religion? Woefully incomplete, and I doubt that it can be successfully expanded. The Manchu are now almost entirely assimilated into Chinese society, and before that their religion was primarily their native Jurchen Shamanism (shaman is just about the only Manchu word adopted into English, BTW) and Lamaistic Buddhism inherited from the Mongols. Neither one would use what we would call a church, as far as I know. --Fire Star 16:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Poorly written article needs improvement, not deleting. Has already survived one AfD [2]. See my comments under Piyu Church above for more on this subject --RoySmith 00:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.