Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man of Steel 2 (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Man of Steel 2 (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL Lady Lotus (talk) 20:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Principle photography has not yet begun, therefore the subject does not meet WP:NFF --| Uncle Milty | talk | 22:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:CRYSTAL, as filming won't even begin for around half a year. Not to mention, I'm not even completely sure the title is set in stone (everything I've checked still calls it Batman vs. Superman or Superman vs. Batman). öBrambleberry of RiverClan 22:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Incubate as failing WP:NFF. However, it's obviously going to be notable when filming begins. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/incubate per WP:NFF and above. Ansh6 6 6 01:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALT name:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or Incubate or Userfy without prejudice for undeletion or recreation when consensus decides it ready. Because the topic of a sequel film has a GREAT deal of coverage in multiple reliable sources (see above alt find sources) ... it's almost enough to qualify as a reasonable exception per WP:NFF's cautions and instructions requiring that production plans for an as-yet-unmade film must be found as notable in order for those plans to merit a separate article. And yes, we do occasionally allow speculative article on unmade film under policy and guideline, but only rarely and only after much discussion and (sorry) angst. Under policy instructions the topic may certainly be discussed in other related articles, but let's revisit this topic in about a year. Let's get a little closer to filming date when we have a little less rumor and a lot more fact. Heck, we can even wait until the final title is decided upon. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect to Man of Steel (film) per WP:NFF. Fanboys. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect of all the searchable titles to Man of Steel (film)#Sequel could work. But still, a userfication or incubation of this current sequel article will allow it to be worked on and improved as we wait. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The film has not begun filming. Koala15 (talk) 04:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.