Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malvika Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nela Ticket. Randykitty (talk) 13:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malvika Sharma

Malvika Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, most coverages are interviews, two or three miniscule articles regarding her impending debut, no independent in depth coverage....  — fr ^❄ 09:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I find enough sources to say that she meets WP:GNG. She appears to have been well-known as a model and in ads before appearing in this film, so there is more coverage that one might expect of her film debut - 'Malvika Sharma to debut with Teja’s film', New Indian Express [1]; 'Malvika Sharma roped in?', Deccan Chronicle [2]; 'New girl on the block!' Deccan Chronicle [3]; 'Actress Malvika Sharma injured in a road accident, shooting postponed', Times of India [4]. However, this article is clearly not ready for mainspace. It was only created today, so Draftify until it is more substantial. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RebeccaGreen, the subject does seem to meet WP:GNG on paper, however, the sources you mentioned (which I also came across) are mere one paragraphs which mention in a very gossipy tone the she has been chosen to play a part in some film. Deccan Chronicle here even goes on to speculates that "Her audition for Nela Ticket could not have been easy, as she was given Telugu dialogues to read". All in all, I believe the sources cannot be considered significant in-depth coverage due to their poor quality of reportage which almost transcends into typical hyperbolic speculation. Additionally, it fails WP:NACTOR by a mile. Regards. — fr ^❄ 17:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• A redirect to Nela Ticket would be helpful, as the movie is what she is known for (and is the only notable thing in her career so far). GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Nela Ticket - TOOSOON for an article at present however she appears to be generally known for the film so makes sense to redirect. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Christmas / Happy New Year} 16:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm okay with a redirect if that's what consensus is. — fr ⁺ 10:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I am torn here because the article seems like a true WP:TNT candidate in it's state to Delete, really. A Redirect to Nela Ticket seems like an optimal thing since she is mentioned there in a sentence at least and could serve as a recreation in the future if she becomes more notable. But I would endorse the admin's decision to altogether Delete the article and then redirect it, as of right now the content is useless to keep in any shape or form. Anyway...she fails WP:NACTOR for lack of multiple significant roles in notable movies or series (only one in Nela Ticket), WP:GNG as well since there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. And no, I am not convinced by RebeccaGreen like with others, because that is all either WP:ROUTINE (she got the role), passing mentions or tabloid puffery. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.