Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malia Pyles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malia Pyles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Also does not pass WP:NACTOR. Could be WP:TOOSOON. AmirŞah 00:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, United States of America, and California. AmirŞah 00:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep:This actor satisfies criterion 1 of WP:NACTOR (namely, she has been in multiple major roles in several notable TV shows i.e. Baskets and Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin). The article also does appear to be somewhat well sourced, although I agree that it could do with a couple more links. Patr2016 (talk) 01:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment photo is a clear copyvio, I've tagged it as such. Unsure about the sourcing for the article text. Oaktree b (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First few sources from Deadline and 1883 are what come up as the first few hits in Google, beyond that there isn't much to be found. Sourcing is ok, not the greatest. Oaktree b (talk) 01:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This actress has been in multiple notable roles in the past and present (thus satisfying WP:NACTOR). I have linked news articles from well-known sources, including Teen Vogue, Cosmopolitan, and Marie Claire, that discuss her current and past work. She has appeared in numerous photoshoots, including one with Teen Vogue. The article is still very new, so any assistance in adding information on this actress would be most appreciated! User:Mjmatousek (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit) It is also worth noting that this actress already has Wikipedia articles in French and Russian, both of which were created in 2021. Mjmatousek (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The French article has very poor sourcing, that's not really helping the case here. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, would like to see more feedback from experienced editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all sources and what turns up in a Gsearch are interviews. Mostly primary sourcing, with little written about her that isn't an interview. Likely TOOSOON, not quite at GNG yet. Her IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes profiles are basically empty, so there has been little to no critical notice of her. Oaktree b (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Mjmatousek. Interviews are allowed as sources, as long as they are not the only sources; what matters is significant, substantial, or broad and deep coverage. Even taking out pure interviews, I found these reviews: seven mentions here, three here, two here, a full story in Teen Vogue with five mentions by name and over 40 pronouns, not a great source but a full story, ditto here, an extended story from a reliable Filipino newspaper, and a fuller article from the Filipino Yahoo news. You can quibble with the quality of specific blogs, but the sheer volume of International reporting proves she's notable according to either GNG or NACTOR. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.