Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malacca Batik House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Malacca Batik House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. batik houses in Malaysia are often fronts for shops, I don't see this as any different. LibStar (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, seems to be a run-of-the-mill structure.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no claim to notability in the article, just another batik place. Kraxler (talk) 19:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.