Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Making Runescape money

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 02:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research and also because Wikipedia is not a game How-To guide. Was prod'ed but the prod notice was removed. Note that there is also a merge-to tag on this article, but I believe that all of the content is original research/How-To, so there is nothing to merge. Gwernol 01:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:OR--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unencyclopaedic. Hyenaste 01:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unencyclopedic. — Deckiller 01:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as stated above, it's just original thought. The merge, of course, doesn't matter, as the article should (and probably will) be gone soon, anyway. -- Kicking222 03:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per TBC. SorryGuy 06:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 07:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, agree with nom -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 08:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Just zis Guy you know? 13:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed. Socom49 16:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. AndyZ _t 22:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — CJewell (talk to me) 05:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.