Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majboor (film)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Majboor (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MOVIE notability requirement lovkal (talk) 09:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: This article is about an old Indian film in 60s. Submitted details are from 2 independent sources and it is too difficult to collect more evidence or links about the film, because of, the film produced and released in 1964.Njaan Parayunnu (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see news articles and/or reviews of the film in order to establish the reception of the film. A plot summary would be good, too. lovkal (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 09:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 09:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know the subject but:
the director Narendra Suri is notable;
the songs may be notable [1].Xx236 (talk) 10:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest a merge of Majboor (film) and Narendra Suri lovkal (talk) 11:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
lovkal, an article about a film should be stand as an independent article. why should it merge with it's director page?Njaan Parayunnu (talk) 06:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since the director is notable, and this film is seemingly not. It could be added in the director's list of movies. lovkal (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: As the film exists and is sourcable and as per WP:INDAFD (I know INDAFD is not warranted). This Hindi language movie is 50+ years old thus do not expect to be able to find online press archives, reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivecos (talkcontribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.