Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maidan Daily

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maidan Daily

Maidan Daily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search turns up nothing. This is one of many dummy publications in Pakistan. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, had a daily circulation of 23,000 in 2004 ([1], p. 705). Plenty of coverage on the attacks against the publication. --Soman (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This only verifies. We need proper source which discusses the subject not directory which lists whole world newspapers. Störm (talk) 10:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Babymissfortune 02:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.