Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahnaz Angury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mahnaz Angury

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:JOURNALIST. Most of the coverage is articles written by her and not WP:SIGCOV about her. Out of the sources supplied 2,3 and 6 are primary. LibStar (talk) 23:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Journalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Afghanistan and Australia. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning delete as it seems WP:TOOSOON in her career, although there is one feature article about her in The Chronicle (which quotes her but also includes some editorial prose which was presumably fact checked). Happy to reconsider if another article is found, but at the moment the content itself also seems thin. Draftification could be another option. No prejudice if this article is recreated again in the future once there is more independent secondary coverage about her. Doesn't satisfy WP:NJOURNALIST as I'm not seeing evidence that her work is widely cited (via Google.com.au and Wikipedia Library). Cielquiparle (talk) 09:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's this brief mention [1]. Plenty of mentions in the Daily Mail, which isn't an RS. Hasn't met GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Daily Mail, in this case the problem is that she wrote articles for them as well. Cielquiparle (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:JOURNALIST seems WP:TOOSOON. Maliner (talk) 07:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON makes one think that in the future the article could be re-created, for which a history would be useful, but there is nowhere to redirect, I suppose. Suitskvarts (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON Karnataka (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.