Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MagicSpam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MagicSpam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't appear to be meeting Wikipedia general notability guideline and Wikipedia notability guideline for organizations (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services. Well, it has managed to survive three years, a week around. All sources related to the subject come from the primary and unreliable blog sites. There is no significant coverage of the subject in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources. There is zero hit on Google news and apparently nothing helpful either on Google books. It is therefore ineligible for inclusion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the developer's page per WP:PRODUCT.Charles (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesdrakew: - Developer's Wikipedia article is a red link, LinuxMagic. There appears to be no parent article to merge or make a redirect. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should have checked. In that case delete.Charles (talk) 08:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no significant coverage of the subject in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 00:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Not seeing any reviews or other significant coverage in WP:RS. Does not meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.