Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Economy of China#Industry and manufacturing. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made in China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically none of the article is actually about the label "Made in China", and the label itself is probably not notable enough to deserve its own article. Perhaps the page should be redirected something like Industry of China? Mucube (talk • contribs) 01:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Mucube (talk • contribs) 01:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Country of origin: The page, in my opinion, should be merged into one with a more general topic, such as Country of origin. The page is filled with content related to the industry of China in general and not the label itself. Some content, such as the first few sections and "Made in Hong Kong" are pertinent, and could be placed into a possible "By country" or "In China" section in the other page. Capsulecap ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article has very little to say on the label itself. It is mostly concerned with manufacturing in China, hence it is an unneeded fork of Manufacturing in China. What little it does say on the label fairly comprehensively misrepresents its source. it's a hodge-podge of an article of random stuff. I wouldn't recommend merging anything to anywhere. SpinningSpark 23:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Manufacturing in China. I doubt it's worth merging anything. If the topic is notable (which it might be), anyone interested in writing an article about it should probably start from scratch. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion to determine, with more certainty, a Merge or Redirect target. Manufacturing in China will not work as it, itself, is a redirect. Other suggestions?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Manufacturing in China seems the best choice. Oaktree b (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I didn't realize Manufacturing in China was a redirect (I should have checked). In that case redirect to Economy of China#Industry and manufacturing and tag as R avoided double redirect. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.