Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MV Princess of Acadia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MV Princess of Acadia

Doesn't seem to meet wp:N nobility. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 02:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 03:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Is the in-depth subject of secondary independent sources like CBC News [1] and others [2][3][4][5] The coverage is substantial. --Oakshade (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article is in stub status, and AfD is not for cleanup. Coverage in third party reliable sources seems to exist as Oakshade indicates. Coldmachine^Talk 07:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though it needs cleaning up; the period covered by the article involves two ships of the same name, and this is not mentioned. . . Rcawsey (talk) 09:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sources in the article plus potential sources provided above provide more than enough evidence that this topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Satisfies WP:N. -Atmoz (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a ship of this size is going to be sufficiently notable. Mjroots (talk) 18:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - multiple sources, and WP:SHIPS standard practice provides that ships of this size are notable. Parsecboy (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there are enough keeps here to WP:SNOW the issue. --Brad (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep alternatively REname and Stubify -- The ship is notable for operating a ferry service in the Bay of Fundy. I would thereofre suggest that the article might be converted into one on Bay of Fundy ferry services, enabling detail to be added of earlier vessels providing the service. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.