Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTJ (clothing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already deleted through CSD— Maile (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

MTJ (clothing)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable company fails WP:ORG Sonofstar (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MTJ (clothing) is stub it has references from Pakistan Biggest News Source and i can add 10 more references but it Article was stub if you want i can expand it and add more refeneces

Speedy delete: per CSD G11, clearly promo CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok If you wanna delete it then delete it you guy's are clearly more professional then me..

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Commander, this could have been speedied; but since we're here, I'm !voting for vanilla delete on the grounds of WP:COMPANY non-notability, with WP:TOOSOON as the cherry on top. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The creator is a confirmed sock of Zaid Zayd, so this is technically eligible for G5. --Blablubbs|talk 15:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.