Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MILF (slang)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MILF (slang)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIC It is a definition of a slang term. There is already another article MILF pornography that actually has content Bhny (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is really a merge discussion, and I oppose such a merge. I can see that the MILF slang exists as a separate entity than MILF porn, with an earlier origination and different usage. Of course, MILF-style porn existed without that moniker long before the slang word was coined, but that fact just gives more credence to the separation of the two topics. Regarding whether we should have an article about slang usage, I think we can if the sources give us adequate material to describe how it's used, with examples. In this case the sources exist. My AfD vote is Keep. Binksternet (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - There are things that deal with and relate to the term "MILF" that have nothing to do with Porn. Then of course there is a genre of Porn that involves MILF themes. This seems like a fairly obvious and blatant distinction. This article serves a purpose and that is to provide a place for MILF related content that isn't porn. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 06:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep MILF and MILF porn are not one and the same. This passes WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What is the topic of the article? If it is the word MILF then this is a slang dictionary entry and has no purpose and should be deleted as per WP:NOTDIC. Otherwise the topic is "sexually attractive older woman", which is too vague for an article. Bhny (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think we understood it the first time you stated it, we just don't agree with your assessment. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 19:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Both "MILF" and "MILF porn" are obviously different so IMHO they should be kept seperate. –Davey2010^Talk 20:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC),[reply]
Keep - the term "MILF" is both slang and an abbreviation, but it has gotten a socio-cultural meaning as well. It and its usage has become somewhat culturally significant. Therefore it's larger than merely "language" or "porn". -- fdewaele, 19 January 2015.
Keep, the page isn't about the genre, but the word itself and it has quite a lot of significance to it and has surpassed being just some obscure slang word. ShawntheGod (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep enough said. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 22:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It should be kept, but expanded. It has become culturally ingrained at this point. It should be kept away from the MILF porn page (I don't even know why that one merits notability...) Wikimandia (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.