Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lycanthrope (film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lycanthrope (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails WP:NFILM and lacks significant mentions in reliable sources. Completely unsourced and WP:OR. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Nothing in Variety under either title. No significant coverage found in Google Books. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.