Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF - too soon for an article. st 170e 14:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per this from April 2016 that shows a still from the film with the caption that it is "currently in production". Therefore it satisfies WP:NFF. Would you consider withdrawing the nom, St170e? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik: Thanks for finding this, I'm happy now to withdraw the nom. I couldn't find a source with evidence/info that it was in production. st 170e 20:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep My Gnews search reveals sufficient coverage to meet GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.