Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludmila Bereznitsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ludmila Bereznitsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable gallery owner, the creator of many rejected articles for apparently all of the artists that she represents. DGG 18:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think here rather minimal academic work makes her notable. As we have deleted most of the articles for the artists she represents as being NN and undocumented--and as all of them have referred for whatever documentation there was to the references in this article, I think it desirable to discuss this one (deprodded for the purpose of discussion)DGG 18:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: fails WP:ATT, WP:BIO. Only eleven Google hits, counting her own website, once you ditch this article and its mirrors [1].  RGTraynor  20:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Info: Cyrilic form of the name is Людмила Березницкая. Pavel Vozenilek 23:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you kindly! That returns 108 unique hits. Doesn't look like she's going to appear on the Ukrainian Wikipedia any time soon either. (Which, in fact, she doesn't.)  RGTraynor  06:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board informed. Pavel Vozenilek 23:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 03:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the argument that this article is not notable enough because there were only eleven Google hits is irrelevent. If you search Google with the Cyrillic version of her name (Людмила Березницкая), you get this result: [2], and when you take out wikipedia: [3]. Also, if you searched with the keywords Ludmila Bereznitsky, your results will be bias as well because there are many way people translate a name. For example, her first name sometimes may include two l's (Ludmilla vs. Ludmila) when translated, and so on. This applies to the last name as well. --Boguslav 19:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: Google counting may not be the best tool here, IMO. Pavel Vozenilek 12:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Very weak delete based on the content of the article. The current text does not suggest much about notability of the person, galleries, foundations or her publications. Consider the vote moot if someone improves the article. If kept the ridiculous overcategorisation needs to be pruned down. Pavel Vozenilek 12:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable self-promotion. Jehochman (^talk/_contrib) 21:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.