Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca (2021 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a clear consensus that this should not exist in article space; however, moving it to draft space would merely create a duplicate of the existing Draft:Luca (upcoming film), which already fulfills the purpose of having a draft. BD2412 T 00:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luca (2021 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy film notability guidelines. In particular, the future film guidelines state that unreleased films are only notable if production is itself notable. This draft says nothing about production, only that the film has been announced. As such, this article is purely promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Is it in fact possible that the film won't be released until a year like 2027?? Georgia guy (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to draft. While it might not be notable now (normally animated films like these are in production for years before they're released), it will be notable in the near future, and this seems like a good enough start. El Millo (talk) 18:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify, it's too soon. The only sourced content is a short premise and a scheduled release date. This information can certainly be represented in another article. I don't know which one, but it does not need its own article yet. BOVINEBOY2008 22:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to draft, per above reasons, as it is too soon for a mainspace article. Cardei012597 (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - This article was put into both article space and draft space, so that nominating it for deletion was the only procedure to deal with it not being ready for article space. As nominator, I do not disagree with draftification. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as WP:NOTPROMOTION, and WP:TOOSOON, no guarantee that this project will go ahead. ps. agree with nom that this should not be draftified. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It's Pixar. Valkyrie Red (talk) 04:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy - Definitely too soon to make. However, the page should not be deleted, as it will just have to be remade when the film does come out. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no evidence this is far enough into production to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If we delete the article, it will just have to be recreated when the film comes out. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:CRYSTAL anyone? Coolabahapple (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that only applies to unsourced stuff. Foxnpichu (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The logo are oficially released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alinha70 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- Official artwork has been released.DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this is an officially announced movie by one of the largest, most famous, and most prestigious animation studios in the world, to be released by the end of next year. I would say this is fully notable as its own article. -Navarre0107 (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to draft - It is too soon to be an article but given it is Pixar it should not be deleted.--Filmgirlfannn (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to little information. Starzoner (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Welp, the way this AFD discussion has gone, it's probably gonna close as No Consensus. Foxnpichu (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What's the point? It's made now and out there. Voicebox64 (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete there is no substance in the votes here. WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON apply. This was announced 8 days ago. It's not even scheduled for release for a full year and in the age of COVID in the US, it's entirely possible it might be scrapped. Until filming has finished or you know, commenced, it is way too soon. Praxidicae (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.