Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lubelska coal mine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lubelska coal mine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source cited makes it clear that this was only a planned project rather than an operating mine. I couldn't find much more information, but this is more recent and on p22 still makes it seem as if it is looking for investment, rather than in operation. SmartSE (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Simply being a planned mine wouldn't be fatal to this article if it had received significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject, but there is no evidence of such coverage - www.lubelcoal.com is clearly not independent of the subject. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. FOARP (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Nuke. Article 95% wrong, even with numbers (outdated and misapplied). The article creator was clueless: It is Ukrainian project and has no relation to Lublin, but to Ukrainian village Lyubelya within the Lviv-Volyn coal basin. And it is not a single mine, but 2 operating and 2 planned. The source cited mentions Poland because, among others, Poland provided help. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, particularly Staszek Lem.--Darwinek (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.