Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyse de Pury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Loyse de Pury

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are either not independent[1], not reliable[2], or not indepth (everything else, basically). Fails WP:BIO. Fram (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Businesspeople, Visual arts, Royalty and nobility, and Switzerland. Fram (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of meeting GNG. I'm also concerned someone with autopatrol and 50k+ edits is still using blogs as references for BLPs, especially after being informed that this is not ok.[3] JoelleJay (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. DrKay (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 02:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No proper coverage to meet notability.Royal88888 (talk) 07:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage. Pure promotion. Auto5656 (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.