Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love in Singapore (2009 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 22:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love in Singapore (2009 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. The only reference in the article is dead. Kolma8 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Kolma8 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There are reliable reviews, namely this and this. More production sources were also found, but I'll add them later. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per two RS reviews, passes NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFILM with the 2 reviews. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it has significant coverage in reliable sources as identified in this discussion so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.