Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Frishwasser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Frishwasser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to establish multiple reliable secondary sources for this artist to pass both GNG and WP:ARTIST. You can see my attempt here. I was unable (even with my connections from my professional & GLAM work) to confirm a collection of her work/archives at the Smithsonian Institution in any capacity. The Met has one small folder of ephemera, but, the curator in my struggles to find that significant enough to establish notability. Her work held in the Sun and Moon Press collection is just one folder in a collection of thousands of archival records. Again, I can't consider that notability.

I did find a few sources with really small event announcements from the 70's, but, I really couldn't find notable multiple secondary reliable sources. Even her website lacked information and sources.

I tried. Perhaps others have something they can discover. SarahStierch (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The creator appears to be affiliated with the subject (it says "designed by philip downing" at the bottom). A well-meaning attempt by a webmaster that fails notability guidelines. Sai Weng (talk) 04:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article seems to over-egg the pudding, considering the two public collections do not contain her art, but folders of ephemeral information. Surprisingly her Biography doesn't make any claims to notability either. Sionk (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.