Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Seigneur

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Seigneur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a person notable only as an unelected candidate for political office. As always, this is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, and a non-winning candidate has to either (a) have preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy (i.e. holding a different notable political office, or clearing our inclusion standards in some other career), or (b) show a depth and range and volume of coverage that would mark their candidacy out as much more special than the norm. But this shows neither of those things: it states nothing about him but the unsuccessful candidacy itself, and cites no sources but a raw table of election results. In fact, I would have been tempted to speedy it for not even making a claim of notability at all, but it's somehow been flying under the radar since 2004 -- so no matter how speediable it may be in principle, I don't feel comfortable arbitrarily killing an article that's been around that long. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.