Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorraine Platt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lorraine Platt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long time unreferenced BLP fails WP:GNG. Nominated for speedy deletion in the past, but the nominator withdrew the nomination. The closest thing to a reference I can find is this but it looks like it may have been written by the subject herself. Pburka (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note. The article indicates that she is listed in The Dictionary of Artists in Britain Since 1945. According to Amazon this dictionary includes biographies of 14,500 artists. I don't think that this constitutes notability. Pburka (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found a reference but don't claim that it establishes notability. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough to meet WP:ARTIST Johnbod (talk) 11:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.