Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loretta Joseph
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Loretta Joseph
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loretta Joseph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. This appears to be little more than a CV. Grahame (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:BIO. A lot of the sources in the article are personal promotions. Although she has been the blockchain advisor to the OECD, I can't find any reliable sources that substantially discuss her (as opposed to companies she worked for). Most coverage just has passing mentions of her in the context of other stories. Deus et lex (talk) 08:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a place to post resumes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this is nothing more than PR spam about a non-notable person with an average career. There is no coverage in RS and certainly none that is independent. CUPIDICAE💕 15:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete - there are a couple of Business Insider-type articles, but that's not enough to show notability. Willing to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.