Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Gale
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Zoids. MBisanz talk 02:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lord Gale
- Lord Gale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge — (all articles that TTN has nominated) into one giant list. Also, it would be cooler if the nominations were merged into one large AfD, but apparently TTN feels that this isn't necessary. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 23:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Zoids (or a list of characters from that universe). Characters are notable within the fictional universe and the nominator does not address the merge possibility. - Mgm|(talk) 11:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Zoids as per Mgm. Edward321 (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.