Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolo Loren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lolo Loren

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional in tone; remove the fluff and very little is left. Does not meet general notability guidelines. ubiquity (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no login or registration, but please delete this article not, because I am coming a lot to Ibiza and found this article interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.10.115.65 (talk) 21:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We added this article and just took text coming from the source White Ibiza en from a book published about the artist. Look at the text of other artists like Cornelis le Mair - which is actually also an artist but also does not have any reference. And we noted that from an art historical perspective that artist is also under discussion while his article is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilegalandart (talk • contribs) 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find "Cornelis le Mair" in Wikipedia. If such an article exists, please provide a wikilink, as it sounds like it should be deleted too. Wikipedia is not a directory for listing artists. Notability must be demonstrated using reliable, independent sources, and I could not find these for Lolo Loren. It is certainly true that there are many articles here which should not be. You can help Wikipedia by proposing them for deletion when you see them. ubiquity (talk) 13:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:PROMO advert of a non-notable artist, full of WP:PEACOCK stuff, no coverage in independent sources anywhere Kraxler (talk) 18:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the best references I can find are a tour of her house in Ibiza, a dealer page in Dutch that looks like fashion photography and a small gallery review on a site related to Ibiza. Artist, yes; notable as established by multiple independent sources, no. Fails WP:GNG and as User:Kraxler says, there's a whole lot of WP:PROMO and WP:PEACOCK going on. New Media Theorist (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.