Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Zunnunova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. and a fourth re-list isn't going to help a poorly attended AfD. Language is an issue for sure Star Mississippi 01:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lola Zunnunova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This bypassed AFC not clear how they are notable? Presenter of non notable show Kinomani, CEO of non notable company Milliy TV and leadership of non notable company Shukrona Media Production. Theroadislong (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Have you checked out the current references? They're all in Uzbek or Russian but they still count. Note that Lola Zunnunova is notable enough to have her own article on ru.wiki and uz.wiki (yes, I know that not all wikis have the same criteria for inclusion but it's an important indicator). You claim that Milliy TV is not notable but I'm not sure what led you to that conclusion. Again, the page does exist on ru.wiki and uz.wiki. It should not be a surprise that nobody on en.wiki is particularly interested in writing a stub on a recently-created Uzbek TV channel but that does not mean that this channel is not notable. Pichpich (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: We are trying to improve coverage of women by encouraging translations from other languages. The lack of English-language sources should not be used as a basis for deletion.--Ipigott (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete from what I can tell a lot of the references are from entertainment blogs and don't contain in-depth coverage of the woman. There are also a few interviews. So the references are not super strong. That said, there does seem to be a good amount of them, I don't speak the language, and therefore I'm not going to assume more can't be found. Which is why I'm going with weak delete based on the poor quality of what there is, but with the caveat that it could really go either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to solicit further opinions on non English (Uzbek and Russian) sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I have not checked the references, but an article should speak for itself without the need for a reader to check the referenced, and this article does not provide evidence of notability. Machine-translating 20 references is tedious; if the originator identifies three principal references, I will check them. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - User:Theroadislong says that this bypassed AFC. I will explain. A draft had been in AFC since the end of November 2021, and had not been reviewed. The author then copied the article into article space in February 2022, at which point I declined the draft, without reviewing the draft, as duplicating the article, and the article was nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.