Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logic and Conversation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gricean maxims. Feel free to merge any usable content from the page history. T. Canens (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logic and Conversation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and Merge content duplicated at Gricean maxims; this article unlikely to be expanded or warrant its own article aside from the subject matter which is covered elsewhere BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 23:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Gricean maxims -- Whpq (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Already covered at Gricean maxims - and perhaps a mention of Grice's 1975 paper should be added to that article (with a reference). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.