Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Martinez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Survived PROD as not being entirely unsourced, but there is no evidence he's notable as a politician (rec'd 8% of the vote, and little coverage of his candidacy) nor as a businessman. StarM 15:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — to actually get a Wikipedia article, he would have to either (a) show that he had preexisting notability for other reasons, independently of the candidacy, that would already have gotten him into Wikipedia anyway, or (b) show a credible and well-sourced reason why his candidacy should be deemed much more significant than most other people's candidacies, in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance. This demonstrates neither of those. Bearcat (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable tounced political candidate. In a state house race even if he received 49/9% of the vote I would probably still think we should delete. Back in 2007 we had much laxer inclusion standards, but as of today this guy fails notability by miles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable politician. SportingFlyer T·C 17:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete falls well short of WP:NPOL as an unsuccessful candidate. Best, GPL93 (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.