Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 5

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 04	September 06 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Evelina Bertoli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jennie (dog)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not inherently notable, happy to merge with Steve Darling. Bringing to AFD as I'm not sure if I'm missing something that makes this notable enough for it's own article. Lordseriouspig 07:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Soto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this previously unreferenced article about an artist, and added two references. I cannot see significant coverage of him, however, and do not think he meets WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. His own website is down. Tacyarg (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, and California. Tacyarg (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Milind Godbole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable CEO of a company, fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV,sources are just passing mentions of the subject. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HN R200

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small company that only produced three examples of a car. No evidence of significant notability, not everything belongs on Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Appears to meet WP:GNG, although I don't speak Czech and can't speak to the quality of the multiple sources in the article. In some cases, a car like this would be covered in the article for its manufacturer instead of having a separate one, but Hoffmann & Novague does not have an article. It's unclear if the three examples that were built by 2019 are all that will be made, or if production continued beyond that point. --Sable232 (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acronical place

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure astrology term, WP:NOTDICT. Two of the three references are on the word "acronical", one of which is a blog. Un assiolo (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions. Un assiolo (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can we just have a Glossary of astrology or something? You can't say a lot about a lot of these things but the terms themselves are discussed and it would be helpful for trying to sort out what is what in the sea of new age nonsense. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that. Mrfoogles (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a Glossary of astrology now. Do you want this article Redirected or Merged?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shekar Natarajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article. Fails WP:BIO. Refs are mostly interviews and profiles. No indication of being notable. scope_creep^Talk 07:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Telangana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is so many citations on his work in this article and he is well known in the world of Supply Chain. 75.149.50.222 (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=M1dROmoAAAAJ&hl=en 75.149.50.222 (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to address the concerns regarding the notability and reliability of the references in this article.

Notability and Achievements:

Shekar Natarajan is a recognized expert in the field of supply chain management. His contributions to the industry have been significant, as evidenced by his receipt of the Medallion Award from the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE) in 2010, which is awarded for notable contributions to the field. It was awarded to only 10 people over the last decade. This award recognizes individuals that have made a notable impact on the industrial engineering profession. The full list of awardees, including Mr. Natarajan, can be viewed here - https://www.iise.org/awards.aspx?id=10802.

Reliable Sources:

In addition to the IISE recognition, Mr. Natarajan has been acknowledged by various reputable industry sources. For example, Material Handling and Logistics News has recognized him as an expert in supply chain logistics. More details about his work and expertise can be found in their coverage here - https://www.mhlnews.com/shekar-natarajan-expert.

Given these points, I believe Mr. Natarajan's notability is well-established within his field, supported by reliable third-party sources.

Thank you for considering these points. 75.149.50.222 (talk) 04:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shekar Natarajan has received several prestigious awards and recognitions throughout his career, acknowledging his significant contributions to the supply chain and logistics industry.* Medallion Award (2010): Awarded by the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), recognizing his contributions to the field of industrial engineering and systems.

DC Velocity Rainmaker (Year): Named as one of the "Rainmakers" by DC Velocity magazine, which highlights professionals who have made substantial impacts in the logistics and supply chain field. Source.
Consumer Goods Visionary (2010): Recognized as a visionary by Consumer Goods magazine for his forward-thinking strategies in the consumer goods industry. Source.Given the multiple awards and recognitions that Shekar Natarajan has received, it is clear that he has made a noteworthy impact in his industry. Deleting this article would mean removing valuable information about a recognized leader in supply chain management, whose work continues to influence the field. This article serves as a credible and informative resource for those interested in learning about influential figures in the industry.

2601:644:9385:FB0:542B:A7A2:4997:3559 (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion needs to see more participation. Looking at the comments thus far, it seems like this subject might have won some prestigious industry awards. Notable awards go beyond the Oscars and Nobels, by the way. A source review would also be helpful here as this is a heavily referenced article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Japan Karatedo Shito-Ryu International Renshikan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial arts organization. The only two sources are from the subject's website. Good faith google search can't seem to give any independent or significant coverage from reliable sources. Lekkha Moun (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

V The Serial

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 07:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vikas Gupta#Television -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for a Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American Silver Eagle mintage figures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY/WP:NOTSTATS. It is not clear why we have these statistics. Not all facts make good encyclopedia articles, no attempt is made to explain why these figures are of enough importance to give them a separate page. Fram (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - is cite-able and notable as world bullion repository currency. -MJ (talk) 08:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back into American Silver Eagle - This article was WP:BOLDly split without discussion. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hannan (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominate this article to debate whether to keep it or eliminate it, due to a transfer to the draft, for my opinion the article maintains relevance and a large number of independent sources that prove its notoriety, if improvements need to be made, they can also be made. In addition, the singer has participated in a very concert. media in your country Alon9393 (talk) 06:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Law and its Introduction in Pakistan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources that discuss this book, merely listings. This incomplete hit on Google Books says... something about the book but I can't tell if it's any longer than a sentence. No sigcov. The past AfD was closed as keep because standards were different in 2006, the author being notable does not help. Redirect to Abul A'la Maududi? The one hiccup is this was initially published not in English, but I cannot figure out what title, so I could not search to see if there were sources in its native language. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Pakistan. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Abul A'la Maududi unless notability can be demonstrated with Urdu sources. Interestingly the Urdu wikipedia article on Maududi doesnt list this work in the list of works by him, so I wonder if it's an english-language editorial collection of translated essays and articles rather than a single work by him. Mccapra (talk) 13:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Islamic Law and Constitution, rewrite and keep. This book has been translated into English from a language not written in Roman script, so a search in English alone will not suffice for BEFORE. We need to know how to transliterate the title into the original script before we can dispute its notability. This seems to be a reprint of part of, and chapter 2 ("The Islamic Law: Its Introduction in Pakistan") of, a book called [The] Islamic Law and Constitution [1]. This book (see another edition, which may or may not have the chapter: [2]) seems to have a lot of citations (80+ in GScholar), and numerous editions, reprints and translations, and reviews in English [3] and other commentary in English (see eg Google Books). His best known book: [4]. There is also a section "Some Opinions about the First Edition" in a section "Islamic Law and Constitution" [5] which quotes book reviews (1) from J.N.D. Anderson in "International Affairs", London (which is here) (2) from "The Dawn", Karachi (3) from "The Hindustan Times", Dehli and (4) from "The Hindu", Madras. Seems to satisfy TBK, GNG and criteria 1 and (judging from the article on the author) criteria 5 of NBOOK. [We should also have an article on the bibliography of islamic law: see [6] and numerous periodical articles.] James500 (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@James500 This is not a reprint - you can find copies of both books online, they have a completely different table of contents and contents. It is not the one chapter of that book, it is a full other book with entirely different contents. I oppose any move because from looking at it it appears to be an entirely different book.

Per Mccapra above I think this is just a translated collection of individual essays with no direct Urdu equivalent. It has nothing to do with the other book. If someone wants to write an article on that book then they can but this is not the same thing. This one has 0 sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, at least some of the text of the 1960 English translation of "Islamic Law and its Introduction in Pakistan" appears to be taken verbatim from chapter 2 of the 1955 English translation of "Islamic Law and Constitution". To me, the 1960 book looks like a rehash of part of the 1955 book. There are bibliographic sources that say that the books "Islamic Law and its Introduction in Pakistan" and a number of other apparently derivative books (such as "Rights of Non-Muslims in an Islamic State" and "First Principles of the Islamic State") are "A Part of Islamic Law and Constitution": [7]. James500 (talk) 07:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@James500 There are plenty of edited collections that have content similarities with one another, with single chapters/essays being duplicated. Just because a work of one author is included in two collections does not make them the same collection. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The cited sources are two press releases (Sylheter Dak and Daily Jalalabad), a list of the ~60 schools operated by the army, a job posting, and the school website. Searches in English and Bengali found a few primary source breaking news stories, generally of the form "so-and-so, a student at Jalalabad Cantonment English School and College",[8] but no independent, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the school itself. Therefore does not meet WP:NSCHOOL and should not be a stand alone article. Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce Seriously? No independent sources or secondary containing significant coverage? Look again and see the citations and what should i attempt to do. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per nom; it is a well-reasoned and convincing argument.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The 4th edit to this article was this nomination for deletion and since then, there has been a lot of editing to it. It might be helpful to review the article again and see if useful sources have been added.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zoë Paul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ARTIST. No awards or recognition. Created by a single purpose editor so possible promo. Sources provided merely confirm where she has exhibited and not SIGCOV. This source seems to be the only indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Visual arts, South Africa, and Greece. LibStar (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Found some additional WP:RS coverage of Paul: Frieze magazine, The Design Edit, Vice (referenced in the article but needs to be archived), StudioInternational (referenced above)

CaptainAngus (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: there are several articles in art magazines about her work and its significance. I added one today that I found. I think she meets criteria 2, 3, and 4d of WP:Artist. Nnev66 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please review article improvements.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Root

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite having nine books to his name, I can't find evidence that any of them pass WP:NBOOK, and thus I don't think this is a pass of WP:NAUTHOR. I checked Kirkus, Booklist, and Publishers Weekly, plus some general searches for his name and some book titles, and only found four total reviews (one each for four books). I didn't find biographical coverage for WP:NBIO either. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arie Hershcovich

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find independent sources with significant coverage suitable to meet WP:NBASIC, and I cannot find evidence to pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPROF. I have looked under both the article name and "Arie Hershkowitz", the name given on the CV in reference 1. Mgp28 (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politics, and Israel. Mgp28 (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. His name is אריה הרשקוביץ. Most of his research is under Arie Herscovici, with other sources under Arie Hershcovich and Arie Hershkowitz. אריה has many spellings as well but hopefully that part is more consistent for this Arie. gidonb (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this. Using "Arie Herscovici" I'm still not seeing enough independent coverage to make me think the article meets the appropriate notability criteria. An attempt at using his name in Hebrew with Google Translate seemed to bring up news stories about people with the same name who are not him, but I will be interested to know if there are sources in Hebrew that show notability. Mgp28 (talk) 17:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both names are fairly common. Hershkowitz is the status quo name in English, French, and German. Herșcovici is the Romanian spelling. gidonb (talk) 23:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of King Kong amusement park attractions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:LISTN, this isn't a notable enough subject to have a list article about. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Amusement parks. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While this doesn't meet WP:NLIST, perhaps this can be converted back into a disambiguation page, as was the case before 2010. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has enough entries with links their own articles, to make it a valid navigational list. List articles are more useful than categories since they allow more information, helping people find what they want easier. Perhaps make an article with all the entries from Category:Amusement rides based on film franchises, and merge this one to it. Dream Focus 01:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even if NLIST isn't met, which I am not necessarily conceding, it can survive as a navigational aid or disambiguation page, which is a perfectly fine ATD. Jclemens (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article is too small. We should see where it can be merged. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 14:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. As a list, this article just doesn't really work due to a lack of significant coverage on this subject, but this is admittedly a useful directory page for those interested in searching about this topic. I'd support a disambiguation so it can better fulfill its purpose, as its current status just doesn't work well as a list. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or disambiguate per Pokelego999. This could fit nicely at a section of King Kong, but a short navigational aid is the best way to frame this. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Not notable enough, plus the list is too small. Should consider merging.

Priscilladfb16 (talk) 22:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as a section on the King Kong page, preferably in prose. It's useful information, but such a short list doesn't need its own page. 22:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- If the article is merged, it would probably be better suited to a sub-article such as King Kong (franchise) or King Kong in popular culture. Epicgenius (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 21:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would keep this as a list, just provide a bit more context as to the time frames when these each started and their licensing arrangements, and any relationships between them. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 22:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 06:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eulogio Tibay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub bio of an inventor sourced only to a patent. I don’t find any in depth coverage in reliable independent sources, just Wikipedia mirrors. Mccapra (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Philippines. Mccapra (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Shawn Klein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an author of three books and many short stories, but I can't find evidence that any of the books passes WP:NBOOK, with at most one RS review each. (Kirkus for And The Dead Shall Live and Sherlock Mendelson; I'm not sure about IndieReader but it's the best we get for The Money). The best claim to notability via awards appears to be two nominations (not wins) for the Pushcart Prize for two short stories. I don't think this is sufficient for WP:NAUTHOR and I haven't been able to find better sourcing for WP:NBIO. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dax Flame

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not enough coverage from reliable sources to warrant a standalone article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asasey Hotel attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT no lasting coverage. Cannot find any coverage of the event after July except for trivial one line mentions in articles discussing other attacks. Closest thing I could find was this: https://www.kormeeraha.com/2021/03/12/canadian-school-renamed-after-hodan-nalayeh/ but it is about a victim more than the attack.

Unfortunately hotel attacks are a common incident in Somalia and just aren't very notable. Could be merged into Hodan Nalayeh, al-Shabaab, or the Somali civil war Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism and Somalia. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to 2019 timeline of the Somali Civil War. Or redirect, it's already mentioned there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and do not merge. Hotel attacks are not a common incident in Somalia just as school shootings are not in the United States, despite what is suggested from news coverage. An attack in which 25+ people are killed is not WP:ROUTINE and there was international news coverage of the attack in global RS including FT, NYT, CNN, AP, BBC, Reuters, etc. More than enough coverage to establish WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:DEPTH, and WP:GNG for WP:NEVENT. Longhornsg (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longhornsg But not WP:SUSTAINED which is one of the more important aspects in WP:NEVENT. There is nothing after a month. Death toll is not notability, plenty of even higher casualty attacks are not notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Three participants and three different outcomes proposed, the definition of No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no issue with merging to the timeline article. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources brought up. @PARAKANYAA:: articles are not required to meet GNG and every applicable SNG but GNG or any applicable SNG. This doesn't have lasting consequences, but it does have plenty of coverage in reliable sources.Alien333 ( what I did
why I did it wrong ) 21:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per replies: I'd forgotten about the whole For Wikipedia's purposes, breaking news stories are also considered to be primary sources bit. — Alien333 ( what I did[reply]
why I did it wrong ) 16:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GNG states sources should be secondary. All the sourcing appears to be primary sourcing. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alien333 That is not what NEVENT is. NEVENT is meant to distinguish/help to distinguish events that may suffer from WP:PRIMARYNEWS (since, initially, that's going to be all of the sources). All of the sources here are primary and therefore none contribute to GNG. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By your logic, every single passing events that blows up in the media for two days has "plenty of coverage in reliable sources"; but we clearly don't have an article on every crime that's ever happened. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is just a news story. There is no long-term coverage in secondary sources. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources found by Longhornsg are all from the time of the event. No WP:LASTING effect to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: User:PARAKANYAA, you have voiced other opinions here. Are you no longer arguing for a Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am still arguing for a merge/redirect since it's part of the greater event and was discussed within that context. I do not think it is notable outside of that. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Just about evenly divided between editors arguing for Deletion and those would be okay with a Merge. I didn't want to relist for a third time but I'd prefer not closing this as No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mala Ciganlija

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly uncited and seemingly vandalised. Perhaps it could be merged in to create a "neighborhoods of Belgrade" article, as, seemingly after 7+ years being marked with onesource, it still remains with only one source. NeoJade ^{( Talk | Contribs )} • she/they 01:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. NeoJade ^{( Talk | Contribs )} • she/they 01:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep + we need more sources. — Sadko (words are wind) 13:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Боки ☎ ✎ 23:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - After a little more reading, I think this may not even pass WP:GNG, searching for the town has on several occasions not brought any results for me. I am still of the belief a merge with a more general "Neighborhoods of Belgrade" could be and should be the way forward as it allows this article to still exist as a redirect, therefore not affecting anything that links here, and also allows for bigger and smaller towns to be on Wikipedia as the neighborhoods are notable as a group, yet probably not individually.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can editor provide new sources that provide SIGCOV that can help substantiate a Keep argument?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tumor alopecia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one source that talks about tumor alopecia and it only includes one small paragraph on the topic:

"Tumor alopecia refers to halr loss in the immediate vicinity of either benlgn or malignant tumors of the scalp. Synngomas, nerve sheath myxomas, and steatocystoma multiplex are benign tumors that may be lim~ted to the scalp and cause alopecia. Alopecia neoplastica 1s the designation glven to halr loss from metastatic tumors, most often from breast or renal carcinoma."^[1]

^ James, William D.; Berger, Timothy G.; Elston, Dirk M.; Odom, Richard B. (2006). Andrews' diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. p. 762. ISBN 0-7216-2921-0. OCLC 62736861.

The source provided is a tertiary source I believe so this doesn't have any secondary sources covering it. Also this page reads like a dictionary definition. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 04:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath, a medical school textbook (which is what's cited there) is generally considered an ideal source in MEDRS terms.

I also wonder whether you're focusing too closely on the exact name given in that one source, when the subject (i.e., hair loss in the immediate vicinity of either benign or malignant tumors of the scalp) might have other names. One of the two sources in ==Further reading== on that page talks about "neoplasm-related alopecia" and the other is about "Alopecia due to cancer". This review calls it "Hair loss in neoplastic conditions".

It would be undesirable to delete an article about a whole subject if what it really needs is to WP:MOVE it to a different title and add some more content. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read over general notability guidelines and saw secondary sources and I think I may have focused too much on that. I was the one that added the further reading sources in an earlier search for some material on the topic. While the original source does distinguish tumor alopecia from Alopecia neoplastica would it be appropriate to merge the pages? I was able to expand the page Alopecia neoplastica a bit. Or possibly mention tumor alopecia on the page Alopecia and redirect there? I will search for literature regarding tumor related alopecia that’s not referred to by that name. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Alopecia, or perhaps move to Cancer-related hair loss and expand further? There doesn't seem to be enough to work with here to write a standalone article, and I don't think Alopecia neoplastica and Tumor alopecia need to be separate articles, but this topic definitely warrants mentioning somewhere. I think a standalone article on cancer-related hair loss (incorporating hair loss from both the disease itself and from treatments) could work, with a mention of non-cancerous tumor-induced hair loss in the main alopecia article. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 05:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It looks like there is support here for a Merge but not agreement yet on the Merge target article. There has to be consensus on that before this discussion can be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Backdoor.Win32.Seed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable trojan, a WP:BEFORE search yielded no non-listical sources. Sohom (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet, and Software. Sohom (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bolgimo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable worm, a WP:BEFORE search yielded no non-listical sources. Sohom (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sohom (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bohmini.A

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no non-listical credible RS found on WP:BEFORE. Seems non-notable Sohom (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Sohom (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur Park (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet NBOOK. The book is also published under the title The Thirteenth Majestral. I have not been able to find any reviews for either title through JSTOR, Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, ProQuest, Newspaper Archive, or Google News. I didn't even find a book listing on ISFDB. I suggest redirecting to the the author, Hayford Peirce. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hayford Peirce. There's about a paragraph in the September 18 1994 issue of the Arizona Daily Star but it doesn't say all too much, not a "review" (just commenting on the name change and Jurassic Park stuff). There's also this which confuses me - is this giving commentary on a location in the book? I have no idea why it's namedropped. Included here but not sigcov. It was translated into Italian but I can't find any sources under the translated name either (L'impero dei dinosauri). PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Cooper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was just created on 3 September 2024, and only because of his appearance with Tucker Carlson where he said some controversial stuff. This is a WP:BLP1E - person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. WP:NOTNEWS also applies here, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. And editors trying to REFBOMB the lead with subpar sources to describe him as a Nazi apologist is not encouraging either. Isaidnoway (talk) 04:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Conservatism, History, Military, Politics, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Xegma(talk) 07:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, is it Huffpo, Haaretz, or TNR that you think is a subpar source? Googleguy007 (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xegma, we are more interested in what the sources say than in your opinion of the subject as a person. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jamilu Ja'afaru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this is a minor government official. The only sources with significant coverage I could find online were written by the subject. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Economics, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Džundev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Diplomat, so not automatically notable. Tagged for notability for 9 years (which is how I found it). I can't find any sources but primary or non-significant coverage. Geschichte (talk) 03:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes it's not expanded nor added sources. Xegma(talk) 03:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, and North Macedonia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2 google news hits is not enough to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination was the 16th edit done by the user, who should familiarize themselves with the Wikipedia community before nominating long-standing articles for deletion, and in doing so, evoking the behaviour of previous users with similar nominations. There is no need to entertain a discussion on such flimsy grounds as is presented here. For a characater known worldwide for decades, WP:SNOW comes to mind if you need another reason. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 03:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bean (character)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Doing A WP:BEFORE Turned up nothing about the character in capacity, heck Most of the Information Is About the show, Not the character. SuperWoodyMan (talk) 03:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SuperWoodyMan (talk) 03:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The character is the show, and the show is all about the character. Not sure what you mean, but the whole article is about the character. And if you click on any of the "Find sources", you will discover a lot more. — Maile (talk) 03:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hans Kayser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced since creation and tagging in 2016. Fails WP:GNG. Sources I found were about a different Hans Kayser (b Buchau, Württemberg, April 1, 1891; d Bolligen, nr Berne, April 14, 1964) who was an academic and writer. 4meter4 (talk) 03:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Businesspeople, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources at all. Xegma(talk) 04:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. See other AFDs by this editor for rationale. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Peanut

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable advertising character which can easily be redirected to the product or organization. SuperWoodyMan (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. SuperWoodyMan (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are quite enough sources in the article, including this New York Times article and this Adweek article, as well as the books What a Character! 20th Century American Advertising Icons and A Century of American Icons: 100 Products and Slogans from the 20th Century Consumer Culture. An obviously notable advertising character. Toughpigs (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. This was the 11th edit of the user, who should familiarize themselves with the Wikipedia community before nominating long-standing articles for deletion. Actually, this behaviour reminds me strongly of Babybunny2007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Geschichte (talk) 03:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is definitely Babybunny2007. What grievance they have with advertising mascots is unknown. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KeepI am not sure this fits the WP:SKCRIT so I did not vote speedy, but it is a keep. Bruxton (talk) 03:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would be SKCRIT number 2 in my opinion. Geschichte (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - See closed AFD for Mr. Bean (character) above. Same nominator. — Maile (talk) 03:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jeremy Curl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Photography, Japan, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yes mostly the sections are unsourced. Xegma(talk) 03:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Situation (A Little Sound and Sugababes song)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, the sources provided is either Primary, questionable for reliability (correct me if I am wrong), and the Guardian one is just a Passing Mention. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Coverage in sources, samples a very popular song and has been in the charts this week. Speedy close. 2A00:23EE:1620:6BEF:253A:B21:2730:AF6 (talk) 02:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly provide any WP:SECONDARY and non-WP:TRIVIAL sources you find? Also just because it is popular does not mean it is good for wikipedia see WP:ITSPOPULAR Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^[1] This is secondary sourcing.2A00:23EE:1690:1BCF:9993:F508:FDB6:6A37 (talk) 03:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anymore? per WP:SIGCOV Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Unsure as why this has been nominated. Well sourced and structured and passes WP:NSONG from what I can see. 90.192.76.192 (talk) 02:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I agree with the previous respondents. This article is significant to the chronology of singles released by the Sugababes, documents current trends in the pertinent genres, and is likely to receive further media coverage. In my view, it would be infeasible to include the contents of this article to a satisfying extent within a different one. PerfidiousSnatch (talk) 02:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against Draftify it for the moment per WP:TOOSOON. As of now, there is no reliable sources I could find to determine it's notability. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PerfidiousSnatch: also, just because it is important for chronology does not mean it is good for wikipedia per WP:ITSIMPORTANT, I author 3 songs articles by now. And I really want to add some but it lacks WP:SIGCOV Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to either A Little Sound or Overload (Sugababes song). All references provided are either WP:PRIMARY or WP:TRIVIAL and I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV. It doesn't matter that this might get more coverage - I might win the lottery tomorrow!--Laun chba ller 07:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting Engineering

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourcing has not improved since the last AFD (soft deleted) and I was unable to locate any additional good sources online. The subject fails GNG and NCORP. Justi yaya 02:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Websites. Justi yaya 02:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Science, Engineering, Transportation, Turkey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Straight Up! to Canada Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Abdul has announced the tour has been cancelled. [9]Pillowdelight (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Events, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the appropriate section in the artists "History" section. An announced and subsequently cancelled tour will likely still be worth a mention there, making it a plausible search term. Sergecross73 msg me 03:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Angela (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find enough sources to establish notability via NBOOK. At present, the article relies on several primary sources, though I added a single review of the series (Aussie Reviews). I've searched the usual book review sources (Google, Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, and Google Scholar) to no avail. I suggest redirecting to the author. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This book gave me what feels like an absurd amount of false positives, but I was able to find two paragraphs of coverage in The Age. I feel this is a bit too short though, and I'm not sure if Aussie Reviews is a blog or not. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. False positives is right. I hoped the author might link some press on his website, but he doesn't, though he does have a set of teaching notes ([10]). This suggests to me that plenty of Australian children might have been familiar with this book through school, but that it isn't that likely to meet wikipedia's notability guidelines. The book was published in the 1990s, so there might be some coverage of it hiding in the digitization gap. The three books in this series are probably best dealt with in a single article, but since that doesn't exist, a redirect seems good for now. -- asilvering (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of alcopops

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly-unsourced list of different "alcopop" products (only cited reference is an Illinois assembly bill from 1977, decades before most of these products were introduced). The list is therefore mostly WP:OR. There is an Alcopops category, which makes this list article redundant as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Westwind Children's Services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references other than their own (defunct) website.

The article is on a now-defunct company that operated charter schools in Arizona. There are two articles on schools; I don't see Westwind Preparatory Academy as a reasonable redirect target. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Arizona. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I created this article, and aside from a reference and a short description, it has remained untouched since. Our standards on articles around schools when I was making lots of articles on schools in 2011 were pretty low, and they are very much not in the year 2024. I just PRODded Canyon View. Let search take people to Westwind Prep, whose basketball program (and associated alumni and controversy) is the sole source of notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCRYSTAL. Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it. Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and West Bengal. C F A 💬 16:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should fall under WP:G4 as the last AFD on this (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election) was barely a few weeks ago, and the page is effectively identical, in terms of sourcing. I have tagged it for CSD instead. Soni (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has been 7 days without that G4, and an IP has already added sources definitely talking about the 2026 elections. Now I support Keeping the article because of said sources Soni (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Never transcluded
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the 1st relisting as the previous comment just indicated that the AFD discussion had never been transcluded. Right now though, no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: 2024 Lok Sabha elections has completed and the recent events with parties' performance can be added, which leads speculations for 2026 election development. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can see, does not meet WP:ORGCRIT, no sources talking about the company independently and seems to be pure advertising. Moved to mainspace too early without review. Also suffers from WP:OVERCITE and WP:SOLUTION - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, and Cyprus. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above I can see it's an paid contribution and trying to promote the company. Xegma(talk) 04:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rich Smith thanks for opening this conversation. Potech is a very notable cybersecurity company but considering the discretion needed around its services, it is rarely mentioned publicly through lengthy articles. That's why I've been facing difficulties finding references sources as such. I also tried to keep the text as short as possible to avoid having it look like an advertisement.

When I tried to submit it for review, I followed my mentor instructions to change the page title (from my username to Potech) and I moved it to mainspace too early without knowing... Is there any way you could support? TechPaths (talk) 05:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about moving it to mainspace "too early". Now that it's the subject of a deletion discussion, we're more interested in the sources that exist about the topic than the present state of the article. Unfortunately, if it's rarely mentioned publicly, that's a strong indication that it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. -- asilvering (talk) 05:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just did some changes that might help, using the existing references. If you have any suggestion, I'd be grateful. TechPaths (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Ackroyd, Stephen (30 August 2024). "A Little Sound: I honestly didn't think this summer could top last year's". Read Dork. Retrieved 31 August 2024.

[n378-1] James, William D.; Berger, Timothy G.; Elston, Dirk M.; Odom, Richard B. (2006). Andrews' diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. p. 762. ISBN 0-7216-2921-0. OCLC 62736861.

[dork-2] Ackroyd, Stephen (30 August 2024). "A Little Sound: I honestly didn't think this summer could top last year's". Read Dork. Retrieved 31 August 2024.

[1]

[1]