Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 February 23" on Wikipedia
- Kusma (討論) 18:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Keep. It has been translated and as previously stated none of the votes call for deletion of a translated version...7 KB (85,777 words) - 18:32, 12 July 2024
- actual articles on the individual games rather than the cities where the games took place. See also Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 22#Template:Olympic...13 KB (1,422 words) - 15:46, 15 April 2023
- at: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_16#U.S._protected_areas. — Eoghanacht talk 12:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Merge Will this be over...56 KB (7,381 words) - 23:11, 6 January 2023
- (Talk) 23:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Fair point, I hadn't noticed that one. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 23#Template:Olympic...58 KB (7,115 words) - 16:03, 15 April 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)...17 KB (1,917 words) - 15:47, 15 April 2023
- or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:28, 11 February 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia...34 KB (3,399 words) - 14:25, 15 September 2022
- Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/August 2005#Template:R from alternate name and others. --William Allen Simpson 14:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC) Keep...45 KB (5,103 words) - 20:26, 16 September 2022
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)...76 KB (9,291 words) - 12:01, 16 September 2022
- or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was USERFY. -Splashtalk 01:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)...26 KB (3,138 words) - 13:20, 29 March 2022
- Alibabs 00:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Keep - It has already been established that "controversial" is not a deletion criteria for userboxes as long as...32 KB (3,521 words) - 20:50, 23 May 2022
- March 2006 (UTC) Looking for these? See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 19/Userboxes instead. -Splashtalk 00:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)...23 KB (2,499 words) - 15:46, 15 April 2023
- it was when it was tagged for deletion, then my vote should be counted as delete. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Delete - useless information...60 KB (7,197 words) - 16:03, 15 April 2023
- 19:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Strong Keep There was already an afd for just this kind of template here Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006...54 KB (6,544 words) - 03:44, 10 March 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splashtalk 00:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)...24 KB (2,823 words) - 01:41, 11 February 2023
- or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)...80 KB (9,669 words) - 22:54, 13 October 2022
- There is important information for editors to consider contained in this version of DRV. -Splashtalk 23:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC) Delete - protect to prevent...35 KB (4,220 words) - 01:10, 20 February 2023
- -Splashtalk 23:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Template:Test4a (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Redundant to test4. Avi 06:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)...34 KB (4,060 words) - 01:41, 11 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splashtalk 01:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)...51 KB (6,651 words) - 20:15, 25 March 2023
- Enchanter 23:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC) It's at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Deleted/October 2005#Template:Offensive. Angr/talk 12:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)...22 KB (2,514 words) - 15:46, 15 April 2023
- --Mike Selinker 06:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC) I definitely sympathize, but I can't see a solution. Alain Robert wouldn't qualify for this category, btw,...66 KB (9,026 words) - 23:10, 6 January 2023
- 17:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Kept. // Pathoschild (admin / talk) 18:22, 23 February 2006 (UTC) IMO this article meets the criteria for speedy deletion because
- talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: delete. — Jeffq 08:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC) Not notable