Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 March 7" on Wikipedia
- your site. User:Kaneda's only edits are to the article up for deletion.--nixie 00:57, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC) It's not an advertisement...it's a reference. I highly...4 KB (33,254 words) - 08:03, 5 April 2022
- Articles for deletion/Log/2005 April 14 Articles for deletion/Log/2005 April 15 Articles for deletion/Log/2005 April 16 Articles for deletion/Log/2005 April...5 KB (2,733 words) - 01:47, 2 April 2020
- from 2005 | Archived delete discussions from 2006→ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 December 31 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 December...21 KB (2,935 words) - 10:34, 5 February 2022
- people should put forward good arguments for retention, deletion or other options. Capitalistroadster 08:16, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep (and wikify). Agree with...4 KB (33,578 words) - 08:03, 5 April 2022
- 23:17, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC) If you think the Pokemon characters/Star Trek/Mario articles shouldn't be here, then by all means nominate them for deletion. I'd...3 KB (37,222 words) - 08:03, 5 April 2022
- favour of deletion. Enochlau 23:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) I dont see why this has to be deleted, it IS the chacarter's bio. --James 02:43, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) The...3 KB (32,455 words) - 05:00, 1 March 2023
- Mar 2005 (UTC) In addition, if you were to suggest the deletion of the articles of the Houses of Caltech then wouldn't you certainly advocate for the...3 KB (24,968 words) - 08:01, 5 April 2022
- —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-7 13:19 Z Non-notable advertisement. Delete 131.211.210.157 13:37, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) Was me (forgot to log in) Mgm|(talk) 13:38, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)...4 KB (28,252 words) - 16:29, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Merge & WP:DA. DoubleBlue (Talk) 7 July 2005 01:17 (UTC) Comment: Thank you for the tip, DoubleBlue. Jaxl 7 July 2005 03:24 (UTC) Redirect, per DoubleBlue...6 KB (49,012 words) - 07:58, 5 April 2022
- to check the deletion log. I'll remember to check it in the future in weird cases like this. Thanks for clearing that up. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-03-2 17:46 Z...5 KB (34,493 words) - 08:02, 5 April 2022
- 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete. Pokecruft. --Carnildo 05:56, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep. Doesn't meet any deletion criteria. Xezbeth 06:00, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) Yes...5 KB (40,861 words) - 08:03, 5 April 2022
- don't always vote for deletion). Radiant! 13:53, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC) Delete, Wikipedia is not a memorial. Megan1967 04:43, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC) Concur, delete...4 KB (28,709 words) - 05:00, 1 March 2023
- (talk) 22:21, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC) See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fort Totten (Washington Metro) --SPUI (talk) 23:12, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete - Niteowlneils...62 KB (6,570 words) - 14:58, 1 September 2021
- --GRider\talk 20:48, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) Not a basis for deletion, a basis for editing. Keep. --Daniel C. Boyer 21:07, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable...4 KB (26,363 words) - 08:01, 5 April 2022
- 2005 (UTC) Whilst I agree that "Articles for deletion" would be more in line with "Templates for deletion", "Categories for deletion", "Images for deletion"...5 KB (28,420 words) - 18:30, 12 July 2024
- sifting through — and this tag still asks for another fair use tag on top of that. — Rebelguys2 talk 21:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. I can see the usefulness...58 KB (7,989 words) - 02:20, 20 February 2023
- 14:45, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep. schroeder's argument for deletion is that the topic doesn't exist. there are 7 cited and linked articles at the end, and...4 KB (39,426 words) - 18:29, 12 July 2024
- or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was delete. -- Scott eiπ 04:26, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC) The...4 KB (27,125 words) - 18:29, 12 July 2024
- Alejandro Pugas are notable enough for articles, but is not an argument for outright deletion. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:36, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of...5 KB (41,097 words) - 08:01, 5 April 2022
- Aeolien 03:36, 2005 Mar 12 (UTC) Ask GRider. He was unaware of this Wookieepedia until very recently, and still he submits articles for deletion based on their...4 KB (40,513 words) - 08:04, 5 April 2022
- 07:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. I've combined Aphaia's proposals on this and on links-only articles into a specific revision of speedy deletion case
- lunchbox 07:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC) I saw something similar the other day, and had the same moral struggle of whether to nominate them for deletion or not, documents