Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local form of the work theorem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Local form of the work theorem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure new theorem being promoted by its developer. Not notable per WP:NOTABLE. Only linked within WP from another obscure theorem by the same editor and mathematician. Lithopsian (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (delete both if the nominator wants to add Generalized-strain mesh-free formulation) as WP:NEOLOGISM/WP:OR. Smmurphy^(Talk) 20:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:Too soon WP:Not a text book. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Promotional (which always seems odd in a scientific context, but applies nonetheless), WP:Too soon -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - synthesis of recently published work. Bearian (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails.Promotional article.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.